Express & Star

Convictions of island owners where 22 died in eruption overturned

The ruling absolves the company from paying millions of dollars in restitution to the families of those who died.

By contributor Associated Press Reporter
Published
New Zealand Volcano Trial
Tourists on a boat look at the eruption of the volcano on White Island, New Zealand (Michael Schade via AP)

The owners of an island volcano in New Zealand where 22 tourists and local guides died in an eruption had their criminal conviction for failing to keep visitors safe thrown out by a judge on Friday.

The ruling absolves the company from paying millions of dollars in restitution to the families of those bereaved in the 2019 explosion on Whakaari, also known as White Island, and two dozen seriously injured survivors.

Most of the 47 people on the island were US and Australian cruise ship passengers on a walking tour, along with their local guides.

The company, Whakaari Management — run by three brothers who own the active volcano on New Zealand’s North Island — appealed their convictions for breaching New Zealand’s workplace health and safety law in a three-day hearing last October at the High Court in Auckland.

They were found guilty in a 2023 trial.

The case hinged on whether the company — which granted access to the volcano to tourism operators and scientific groups, for a fee — should have been in charge of safety practices on the island under New Zealand’s workplace health and safety laws.

Anyone in charge of a workplace must ensure the management of hazards and the safety of all there, including at entry and exit points.

Survivors told the trial in emotional testimony during the company’s 2023 trial that they had not been told the active volcano was dangerous when they paid to visit it. They were not supplied with protective equipment, and many were wearing clothing that made their horrific burns more damaging.

In Friday’s written ruling, Justice Simon Moore ruled the company did not have a duty under the relevant law to ensure that the walking tour workplace was without risks to health and safety.

He agreed with the company’s lawyers that the firm only granted access to the bare land through permits — and should not have been legally considered an entity that managed or controlled the workplace.

The judge ruled it was not unreasonable for the company to rely on tourism operators — who were licensed under New Zealand law — and emergency management and scientific agencies to assess the risks of activities on the island and manage safety precautions.

The case had far-reaching implications and changed the laws governing New Zealand’s adventure tourism industry, which is often based on outdoor thrills on or around the country’s many natural hazards.

Operators must now take all reasonable steps to inform customers of any serious risks.