Clubs are set for talks over future

The meeting has been arranged after the Department of Culture, Media and Sport said any more money to help clubs complete the season would have to be paid back.

Clubs received a share of £10million in government funding to allow the season to start back in October, but that has now run out and with little prospect of income being generated by supporters returning to the ground it may not be viable for the campaign to continue. A vote to end the campaign is unlikely today, but could be made by the end of the month.

And Dagenham & Redbridge managing director Steve Thompson insists the government would end up paying more money to clubs via the furlough scheme if the league was cancelled than they would have to through another grant as he implored them to make grants, not loans, available to clubs.

He said: “There are a couple of things, whether the DCMS are prepared to reconsider their decision, which I really hope they will do and then how secure clubs feel that they are going forward.

“When it became clear that we weren’t going to get supporters back negotiations started again with the DCMS, it started to become apparent that it would have to be via loans.

“But that has only been crystallised in the last week or so. We have asked the DCMS to reconsider.

“I don’t know how that has gone, a letter was sent to the Secretary of State on Friday. I don’t know whether there has been any response to that.

“We’ll know within the next couple of weeks. The decision would have to be made before the end of January.

“I can’t see how clubs can commit to wages after the end of January. The frustrating thing is that if the season was to end, we would end up putting all of our players and staff on furlough and it would cost more money in furlough money than we would get in a grant.

“That doesn’t make sense, we would be better off playing.”

Thompson says clubs made the decision to restart the season in October under the premise that grants would remain available in the event that supporters were not allowed back in and that the goalposts have since changed.

He added: “I think clubs quite rightly feel aggrieved and I know there are a lot of people saying had we known this when we kicked off, that if supporters weren’t going to be let in then there wasn’t any more grant money available it would have to be in the form of loans, then they could have made a conscious decision back in September on what would be the best thing for them to do.

“By giving the impression we were going to get grant money if supporters weren’t allowed back in by January then clubs have taken on players on new contracts. Kicking off the season has given them a liability for the whole season.

“Had we not kicked off we would not have had that liability. You can understand the feeling of frustration among many of the clubs. I wouldn’t like to call this one way or the other because I just don’t know.”

York, who are in National League North, are primed to move into a new 8,000-seater stadium and announced the signing of two new players on Monday.

Chairman Jason McGill wants the season to continue.

“What is going to happen I really can’t say,” he said. “I don’t want the season to be curtailed I want the season to be played, we have started the season, we have signed players and that budget didn’t account for any supporters through the gate.

“I think there will be some football clubs struggling.

“Every club has to vote for themselves. Primarily clubs have got to keep going and can’t go into administration or liquidation which could be the outcome on the continuation of football without crowds.

“York City are not in that position but other clubs are and they have got to protect their own interests.”