FBI agent at Sandy Hook breaks down at trial of conspiracy theorist Alex Jones

An FBI agent struggled to control his emotions as he described seeing bodies inside Sandy Hook primary school — a scene that conspiracy theorist Alex Jones later claimed was staged by actors.

William Aldenberg was the first witness to give evidence as a Connecticut jury began hearing statements in a trial to decide how much money Jones owes for spreading the lie that the 2012 mass shooting in Newtown did not happen.

Mr Aldenberg broke down as he described being among the first law enforcement officers to enter the two classrooms where 20 children died.

“Was what you saw in that school fake?” asked Christopher Mattei, a lawyer for the plaintiffs.

“No,” Mr Aldenberg said. “It’s awful. It’s awful.”

He also told how he and others in the community and law enforcement were targeted with threats and conspiracy theories, including one that claimed he was an actor who also pretended to be the father of a victim.

“It’s one of the worst things that ever happened, if not the worst thing that ever happened here, what happened to them,” Mr Aldenberg said. “And people want to say this didn’t happen? And then they want to get rich off of it? That’s the worst part.”

The trial in Waterbury, less than 20 miles from Newtown, where the children and six teachers were shot dead, was attended by more than a dozen family members of victims, including David Wheeler, the father who conspiracy theorists claimed was the same person as Mr Aldenberg.

Mr Wheeler nodded as Mr Aldenberg apologised for what he had to endure because of their resemblance.

The Sandy Hook families and Mr Aldenberg say they have been confronted and harassed for years by people who believed Jones’s false claim that the shooting was staged by crisis actors as part of a plot to take away people’s guns.

Some say strangers videotaped them and their surviving children. They have also endured death threats and been subjected to abusive comments on social media.

Some families have moved out of Newtown to avoid harassment, and accuse Jones of causing them emotional and psychological harm.

“You know, you can say whatever you want about me, I don’t care,” Mr Aldenberg said. “Just say what you want. I’m frigging big boy. I can take it.

“But then they want to make profits, they want to make millions and millions of dollars. They want to destroy people’s lives. Their children got slaughtered. I saw it myself, and now they have to sit here and listen to me say this.”

It is the second such trial for Jones, who was ordered by a Texas jury last month to pay nearly 50 million dollars (£43 million) to the parents of one of the murdered children. Jones was not at the trial on Tuesday but is expected to attend next week.

A jury of three men and three women along with several alternatives will decide how much Jones should pay relatives of eight victims and Mr Aldenberg. Judge Barbara Bellis found Jones liable without a trial last year after he failed to turn over documents to the families’ lawyers.

The judge also sanctioned Jones on Tuesday for failing to turn over analytic data related to his website and the popularity of his show. She told his lawyers that because of that failure, they will not be allowed to argue he did not profit from his Sandy Hook remarks.

In opening statements, Jones was described by Mr Mattei as a bully and by his own lawyer as a crank who should be ignored.

Mr Mattei showed jurors data indicating how Jones’s audience increased as he spread lies about the shooting. He also showed them photos and videos of things Jones had said, and told the panel they already had the tools from their own life experiences to decide what to do in this case.

“What your parents taught you, what your grandparents taught you to know the difference between right and wrong, to know the difference between the truth and a horrible lie, to know the importance of standing up to bullies when they prey on people who are helpless and profit from them, and to know unless you stop a bully, a bully will never stop,” he said.

“And when it comes to stopping Alex Jones, that will be the most important work that you do.”

Jones’s lawyer Norm Pattis argued that his client has espoused a number of conspiracy theories over the years, which he has a constitutional right to do.

“At what point do we regard him as a crank on the village green, a person we can walk away from if we choose?” he asked.

Mr Pattis told the jury that although Jones is liable for damages, any award should be minimal and alleged the families were overstating the harm Jones caused.