Express & Star

Tiny adult limb bone fossil sheds light on origin of ancient ‘Hobbit’ humans

Findings suggest small-bodied ancient humans may have evolved from another extinct species called Homo erectus.

Published
Last updated
The upper arm bone fragment excavated at the Mata Menge archaeological site in Flores, Indonesia

Scientists have discovered what they believe to be the smallest adult arm bone in human fossil record, shedding light on a group of mysterious “Hobbit” humans that lived thousands of years ago.

The “astonishingly small” limb, believed to be around 700,000 years old, was found in the island of Flores in Indonesia, along with two teeth fossils.

Analysis suggests the remnants belonged to diminutive individuals even smaller than Homo floresiensis – enigmatic human species named after fantasy author JRR Tolkien’s fictional race of people in Lord of the Rings.

The Mata Menge upper arm bone fragment, left, shown at the same scale as the humerus of Homo floresiensis
The Mata Menge upper arm bone fragment, left, shown at the same scale as the humerus of Homo floresiensis (University of Tokyo/PA)

The researchers now believe these small-bodied people may have been early relatives of H. floresiensis, who were wiped about around 50,000 years ago around the time when modern humans (Homo sapiens) began to arrive in Asia.

The team also thinks the so-called Hobbits may have have descended from another extinct human species known as Homo erectus – often thought of as a direct ancestor of modern humans.

Professor Adam Brumm, from Griffith University’s Australian Research Centre for Human Evolution, said: “The evolutionary history of the Flores hominins (human relatives) is still largely unknown.

“However, the new fossils strongly suggest that the ‘Hobbit’ story did indeed begin when a group of the early Asian hominins known as Homo erectus somehow became isolated on this remote Indonesian island, perhaps one million years ago, and underwent a dramatic body size reduction over time.”

Remains of H. floresiensis were first unearthed in 2003 in a remote cave in Flores.

At around 106cm tall, these ancient human species were slight in stature, but over the past two decades, they have attracted lengthy debates because of their mysterious origins.

For the study, published in the journal Nature Communications, the researchers analysed the new fossils discovered in Mata Menge, an open-air site not far from where the H. floresiensis remains were found.

Discovery locations of Homo erectus in Java and Homo floresiensis in Flores, both in Indonesia
Discovery locations of Homo erectus in Java and Homo floresiensis in Flores, both in Indonesia (University of Tokyo/PA)

An examination of the upper arm bone fragment suggests these ancient humans would have been around 6cm shorter than H. floresiensis, the researchers said.

Yousuke Kaifu, of the University of Tokyo in Japan, said: “When I first saw the small humerus (upper arm bone), I thought it was a child’s bone, but I became curious and was surprised when I looked up its developmental stage.

“The task of estimating the age and length was difficult, but through collaboration with my co-researchers, we were able to solve the problems to produce these results.”

The two teeth from Mata Menge are also small in size, the researchers said, with one bearing features consistent with the early H. erectus in remains found in the nearby island of Java.

Professor Brumm said: “This 700,000-year-old adult humerus is not just shorter than that of Homo floresiensis, it is the smallest upper arm bone known from the hominin fossil record worldwide.

“This very rare specimen confirms our hypothesis that the ancestors of Homo floresiensis were extremely small in body size; however, it is now apparent from the tiny proportions of this limb bone that the early progenitors of the ‘Hobbit’ were even smaller than we had previously thought.”

Commenting on the study, Dr Mark Grabowski, a senior lecturer in evolutionary anthropology at Liverpool John Moores University, who was not involved, said that if the dates and age estimate of the fossils are accurate, the findings may “appear to seal the fate of pathological explanations of Homo floresiensis”.

Sorry, we are not accepting comments on this article.