Kingswinford retirement flats plan rejected after football authorities object
Football authorities were among objectors to plans for a block of retirement flats in Kingswinford which have been rejected.
Watch more of our videos on ShotsTV.com
and on Freeview 262 or Freely 565
Dudley Council rejected a proposal to demolish the former youth centre on High Street to make way for 49 apartments and associated facilities.
The site contains play areas including a basketball court which would be removed and replaced with a multi-use games area (MUGA) however Sport England, the Football Foundation and the Birmingham FA had concerns.
A report from Dudley Council planning officers said: “Sport England considers that the plans do not show how the location of the MUGA and play area might impact on the capacity of the playing field to provide playing pitches.
“Sport England have consulted with Football Foundation (FF) who advise that the site is used by Kingswinford Knights FC and that parents usually park within the car park to the side of the youth centre and sometimes use the basketball court as an overflow.
“Sport England advise that the FF and Birmingham FA object to the proposed development.”
Applicants Churchill Living Ltd said: “Both the proposed new multi-use games area and children’s play area would be a welcome replacement and overall betterment to the existing facilities which are at the end of their functional life.”
Parking was another issue for planning officers who concluded the scheme did not provide enough spaces for the new building or allow for the loss of spaces for visitors to the public recreational facilities.
The design of the four-story building, which would provide 33 one-bedroom apartments and 16 two-bedroom units, was also a problem for planners.
Churchill Living Ltd said: “The detailed design of the scheme takes into account the development patterns, size and scale of the existing urban fabric of Kingswinford whilst providing accommodation that is tailored to the specific needs of the future owners.”
Dudley planners in refusing the application however concluded: “The proposed development by reason of its design, excessive scale and density would appear unduly prominent and uncharacteristic to the detriment of the street scene and character and appearance of the area.”
